Fix pre-launch inconsistencies
- Update energy values in hook scripts to match calibrated methodology (0.1/0.5 Wh per 1K tokens, was 0.003/0.015) - Fix license in toolkit README: CC0, not MIT - Update H2 sharing framing to match "beyond carbon" positioning
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ac6225538
commit
2bfe786a6f
4 changed files with 17 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -41,18 +41,20 @@ separately as handoffs.
|
|||
|
||||
**Link to share**: https://llm-impact.org
|
||||
|
||||
**Suggested framing**: "I built a framework for estimating the full cost
|
||||
of AI conversations — not just energy and CO2, but deskilling, data
|
||||
pollution, power concentration, and 17 other categories. It's CC0 (public
|
||||
domain) and I'm looking for corrections to the estimates."
|
||||
**Suggested framing**: "Most AI impact tools stop at carbon. I built a
|
||||
framework covering 20+ cost categories — including cognitive deskilling,
|
||||
data pollution, algorithmic monoculture, and power concentration —
|
||||
calibrated against Google's 2025 per-query data. CC0 (public domain),
|
||||
looking for corrections to the estimates."
|
||||
|
||||
**Where to post** (in rough order of relevance):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Hacker News** — Submit as `https://llm-impact.org`. Best time:
|
||||
weekday mornings US Eastern. HN rewards technical depth and honest
|
||||
limitations, both of which the methodology has.
|
||||
2. **Reddit r/MachineLearning** — Post as a [Project] thread. Emphasize
|
||||
the methodology's breadth beyond just carbon accounting.
|
||||
2. **Reddit r/MachineLearning** — Post as a [Project] thread. Lead
|
||||
with "beyond carbon" — what makes this different from CodeCarbon
|
||||
or EcoLogits.
|
||||
3. **Reddit r/sustainability** — Frame around the environmental costs.
|
||||
Lead with the numbers (100-250 Wh, 30-80g CO2 per conversation).
|
||||
4. **Mastodon** — Post on your account and tag #AIethics #sustainability
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue