Tasks 10-11: AI authorship transparency + calibrate energy estimates
Task 10: Add "How this was made" section to README disclosing AI collaboration and project costs. Landing page updated separately. Task 11: Calibrate energy-per-token against Google (Patterson et al., Aug 2025) and "How Hungry is AI" (Jegham et al., May 2025). Previous values (0.003/0.015 Wh per 1K tokens) were ~10-100x too low. Updated to 0.05-0.3/0.25-1.5 Wh per 1K tokens with model-dependent ranges. Worked example now produces ~246 Wh, consistent with headline figures.
This commit is contained in:
parent
67e86d1b6b
commit
a9403fe128
2 changed files with 68 additions and 16 deletions
|
|
@ -44,6 +44,15 @@ Most estimates have low confidence. Many of the most consequential costs
|
|||
The quantifiable costs are almost certainly the least important ones.
|
||||
This is a tool for honest approximation, not precise accounting.
|
||||
|
||||
## How this was made
|
||||
|
||||
This project was developed by a human directing
|
||||
[Claude](https://claude.ai) (Anthropic's AI assistant) across multiple
|
||||
conversations. The methodology was applied to itself: we estimate the
|
||||
project consumed ~$2,500-10,000 in compute, ~500-2,500 Wh of energy,
|
||||
and ~150-800g of CO2 across all sessions. Whether it produces enough
|
||||
value to justify those costs is [an open question we are tracking](plans/measure-project-impact.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
Corrections, better data, and additional cost categories are welcome.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue