CC0-licensed methodology for estimating the environmental and social costs of AI conversations (20+ categories), plus a reusable toolkit for automated impact tracking in Claude Code sessions.
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB
Task 7: Define positive impact metrics
Plan: measure-positive-impact
Status: DONE
Deliverable: New section in impact-methodology.md
What to do
-
Add a "Positive Impact" section to
impact-methodology.mddefining proxy metrics:- Reach: number of people affected by the output.
- Counterfactual: would the result have been achieved without this conversation? (none / slower / not at all)
- Durability: expected useful lifetime of the output.
- Severity: for bug/security fixes, severity of the issue.
- Reuse: was the output referenced or used again?
-
For each metric, document:
- How to estimate it (with examples).
- Known biases (e.g., tendency to overestimate reach).
- Confidence level.
-
Add a "net impact" formula or rubric that combines cost and value estimates into a qualitative assessment (clearly net-positive / probably net-positive / uncertain / probably net-negative / clearly net-negative).
Done when
- The methodology document covers both sides of the equation.
- A reader can apply the rubric to their own conversations.